It's the government's role to regulate. On citizen's behalf. That's why we elect them.
From the article Wouldn't there be a backlash against government intervention in those investments? Uh no. The government is regulating investments and business practices all the time. When investor activity adversely affects non-investors, especially in core areas like housing, people expect protections. Look where investor greed got most of the G20 countries in 2009. For sure the government should consult all stake holders but most people expect their government to work for them not corporations. It corporations role to figure out how to profit under the rules.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/peter-armstrong-housing-government-intervention-1.4082904
I live in a small Canadian Prairie city with a spouse and a dog. We retired in 2018. This is what life is like.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Weight loss is more than calories in and calories out. Research using a pool of 10,000 participants. People tend to gain weight back. Differ...
-
We were in Edmonton so I took the opportunity to visit the Microsoft Store, check out the Go and finally purchased it. I knew there was a ...
-
Have you checked out your google info? Now much clearer! https://www.androidcentral.com/google-account-page-android-updated-new-ui-and-featu...
Well said, Cass. I have been reading elsewhere that Canada avoided the brunt of the financial catastrophes of the 2000s because its system was focused on reliability, not speculation.
ReplyDeleteI heartily agree!
ReplyDelete