Thursday 25 October 2018

For US Politics, why doesn't the MSM simply refer to Federal Government? Why cover rallies when there's no coverage of the ongoing demonstrations outside the WH?

For US Politics, why doesn't the MSM simply refer to Federal Government? Why cover rallies when there's no coverage of the ongoing demonstrations outside the WH?

Do not quote - it's not as if there are coherent gems of wisdom imparted. Just starve him of personal credit. Name recognition and fearmongering got him elected. Change that coverage. Report only on who benefits from policies and how. Sea change from political entertainment to political reporting. It’s one party who’s has majority control who is promoting unfounded conspiracy theories so don’t attribute to one person.
https://www.themarysue.com/the-mary-sue-is-instating-a-donald-trump-social-media-blackout/

3 comments:

  1. A marvellous idea! Here's hoping it takes hold.

    I'm curious how far this name ban extends? I've never ever referred to him other than "Dr- - -pf". There are quite a selection of other derogatory nicknames. Are those verboten, I wonder?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think as a attention hog, any mention, direct or indirect is a bonus. I look at this like dog training. Any attention is a reward and reinforces that behaviour. It may also be that I'm training a puppy right now.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Exactly what is needed, Cass Morrison! I’ve been bringing up the idea on pluspora of thinking before reposting, so that we don’t unwittingly cooperate with the psychological warfare waged by the right. Talk about policies and how they are affecting people!

    ReplyDelete