Mentioning "identity politics" gets the surveyed group to want more conservative policies. Understanding why is integral.

Mentioning "identity politics" gets the surveyed group to want more conservative policies. Understanding why is integral.

As "not a Social Scientist" I can only think people understand identity politics recognizes a "default identity" which is exclusive of others whether it personally benefits them or not. This will be a key component in both legitimate and "troll" election talking points.

You see some of it being uncovered in Canada. Sheer talks about Trudeau "virtue signalling". That seems to mean openly stating support for human rights rather than being a silent partner in turning a blind eye with excuses about sovereignty. Creating a diverse cabinet rather than default boys club with a token woman seems to have lead to just as effective (and you can take that anyway you want) policy and implementation. Even looking for consensus has not lead to much more agonizing change than slapping an authoritative skin on policies that encourages people to look for loopholes so they don't have to comply.

Canada's immigration system is failing - not because of entry requirements but the long wait times making it difficult to remove people are not assessed in a timely manner. Same with refugees. The solution isn't to close borders but increase support staff so everyone can be better assessed not just go on personal bias and stereotypes.

It's up to more progressive parties to emphasis how "identity politics" makes life better for everyone in a diverse society without penalizing the default identity. It's up to us to ensure politicians know our values by communicating them. Most will be responsive.
https://psmag.com/.amp/news/how-the-identity-politics-argument-affects-a-partys-choices